Comments on: I Wanted to “Slow” Burn This Book

By: MAS

MAS — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:34:07 +0000

@Paul – I didn’t disagree with the slow training protocol. I just felt the author did a poor job explaining it and his thesis that humans are fragile, I believe, is false. If you read this site, you will know that I am close in opinion to the author on training volume. I am also anti-cardio too.

However, Body By Science did a much better job explaining slow tempo training.

I tried the slow tempo protocol and it mostly bored me.
Is Slow Motion Weight Training Superior?

By: Paul Dutcher

Paul Dutcher — Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:26:24 +0000

Sorry old chap – it worked for me, hundreds of thousands of lay people, movie stars, Brad Pitt used it for the movie Troy etc.

You must be a trainer thats upset that people are wising up to the outdated three to four days of marathon volume training of the 70s.

By: Is Slow Motion Weight Training Superior? | MAS o Menos

Is Slow Motion Weight Training Superior? | MAS o Menos — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:08:42 +0000

[...] two books that advocated using a super slow movement while weight training. One of the books was awful and one was outstanding. I ended my review of the second book with this statement: Will I be [...]

By: Body By Science | MAS o Menos

Body By Science | MAS o Menos — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:03:12 +0000

[...] McGuff and John Little makes a damn good case for super slow weight training. As I stated in a previous post, I read this book because I am unconvinced that slow training is superior to normal or explosive [...]