Two Week Blog Break

I am going to be mostly offline until May 30th, so I probably won’t have any new posts until June.

The redesign is mostly finished. There are still a few things I want to fix, but that will have to wait for now. The good news is the site looks awesome on mobile and the new search engine is much better. It not only searches posts, but your comments as well. Results are not returned in date order, but weighed for relevancy. If you have a WordPress site, look into Relevanssi. Their free version is excellent.

When you do a blog redesign, you stumble upon older posts. Some that are still good and others that aren’t. As tempted as I am to remove some of the stinkers, I don’t. A blog is place where I can throw up an idea that was on my mind that day. It doesn’t mean that I’ll keep that opinion. I often don’t.

critical-mas-1998

Critical MAS logo from 1997.

The Critical MAS blog now has 1,898 posts and 7,825 comments. It has 487,633 words (not counting this post). Finding the good posts can be difficult for even me. While I am away, I’ll be thinking about better ways to highlight the better posts. The BEST OF section above is OK, but not ideal. Until then, here are 10 random posts I still like.

  1. Tales From the Glitter Gym – The Commando
  2. The Problem With Boot Camp Training
  3. Space Needle For $1
  4. How To Get Lower Rent
  5. Rejecting Nutrition
  6. True Job Insurance Means Shorting Your Own Company
  7. Rejecting the Naked Warrior
  8. How Tim Ferriss REALLY Gained 34 Pounds of Muscle in 28 Days
  9. Blinded By Successful Outcomes
  10. Kimchi 2.0

 

The Twinkie Diet Proved Nothing

I wrote this post two years ago, but never hit publish. It got lost in the drafts. Consider this a “lost episode”.

In 2010, Escape the Herd alerted me to the story of a professor that proved that fat loss was all about calories and not about nutritional quality. I still read people that cite this study as proof that it is all about the calories and if you just cut the calories you’d lose the fat. For those unfamiliar with the diet, read Twinkie diet helps nutrition professor lose 27 pounds:

His premise: That in weight loss, pure calorie counting is what matters most — not the nutritional value of the food.
The premise held up: On his “convenience store diet,” he shed 27 pounds in two months.

In my opinion his study proved very little.

The only thing this study showed is that in the short term a single healthy male of 41 years old with University resources can eat a mostly poor diet and lose fat. How does this further our knowledge on obesity? It doesn’t. There are many examples of prisoners of war or concentration camps where those detained consumed nutrient poor and calorie restrictive diets. And they lost weight.

When we discuss fat loss, we should be striving for long term and sustainable. I suspect that one of the reasons people over eat is because they are under nourished. Putting out press releases saying you can lose fat eating Twinkies isn’t helping those that struggle with dieting that may have real health issues in addition to being overweight.

Twinkies

Photo by Joel Kraut. 

Hostess vs High Velocity Super Warrior

Since so many people seemed hellbent on showing that the only thing that matters is calories, I’d like to propose a study. My study would add two additional metrics: long-term success and perceived hunger. Take 100 people with at least 50 pounds to lose over the age of 30 evenly divided by sex.

  • Group A: They would follow the caloric restrictive Twinkie diet for 2 months.
  • Group B: They would get 70% of their calories from the foods listed on the post High Velocity Super Warrior Foods.

If a calorie is a calorie, they should lose weight at equal amounts. Fair enough, but that part isn’t interesting. I want to see what happens when they resume normal eating. Who keeps the weight off better and feels the least hunger? The Twinkie group or the Super Warriors? I strongly suspect it won’t be the Hostess group. I believe the more nourished group will have greater long term success.

New Offer from 23andMe

I just got an email from a 23andMe account representative that they are now offering 20% additional kits.

Explore your DNA with your family. Now 20% off on all additional kits.

For those that are interested in learning more about my experiences with 23andMe, see these two posts.

23andMe Results
Genetic Testing for the Health Conscious Coffee Drinker

Later this year I will be doing a post on the Ancestral side of the 23andMe report.

Disclosure: I am an affiliate of 23andMe and get sweet referral money from those that sign up after following a link from this site. :)  

The Next Version of Critical MAS

I plan to release a new version of this blog sometime in June. Some ideas I have so far include:

  1. New theme. The current theme I am using hasn’t been updated in a long time and unsupported themes can be problematic.
  2. Better typography. Although I like the fonts on this site better than 95% of all sites, I still think they can be more readable.
  3. Slightly wider content area. I’d like to start adding 640 pixel width images to posts without having them cramp up.
  4. Mobile. I had an OK mobile theme for a long time, then I tested a mobile app solution that ended up not working for me. When I tried to roll back to the older mobile theme, it wouldn’t work. The new theme will be Responsive, meaning one design to fit itself to a wide range of devices from monitors to tablets to phones.
  5. Better search engine. I’ll be deploying a site search engine that will not only search posts, it will also search user comments. 99% of blogs don’t have this capability. I’ll also be able to weigh content, so better posts appear higher than newer posts in the search results.
  6. A little bit faster. This site usually moves pretty fast, but I’ll explore some ideas on increasing performance.

Any other ideas? What would you like to see improved on the next version of Critical MAS?

 

Never Forget that Size is the Prize

Gather around my fellow ectomorphs. I have something to say about weight training. My belief is that our goals got mixed up when we starting following the bad advice of genetically gifted mesomorphic fitness trainers. We forgot why we started lifting weights.

I’m going to speak for myself, but I pretty sure I’m not alone. The reason I started lifting weights was to gain muscle. I wanted to be bigger. I did not like having scrawny arms and legs. I wanted muscle. Back then the scrawny hipster look didn’t exist. Back then being a Stick Boy sucked.

Like many other lanky males, I joined a gym to get muscle and size. The first 10 pounds of muscle came effortlessly. Using the machines was a great introduction to strength training. But then like other ectomorphs I got impatient and made the classic false assumption made by so many.

If the big guys in the gym are lifting free weights and not using machines, then free weights must be better for size. And the guys that lift the most weight tend to be the biggest, therefore to get bigger I needed to lift heavier free weights.

I could spent paragraphs going through all the false assumptions, but instead I want to focus on how the goal of “getting bigger” got replaced with “getting stronger” and that “getting stronger” became defined as lifting more pounds using the classic bodybuilding exercises of barbell squat, bench press and the dead lift.

Now I have come to believe that the quest to get stronger using classic definitions of strength is a major factor in limiting the muscular potential of ectomorphs. But I am getting ahead of myself.

MAS Flex

Come for the Muscle, Stay For “the Strength”

I fell for it. At a certain point I found gaining muscle difficult. I was doing squats, dead lifts and benching. I read everything. Pavel, Bill Pearl, T-Nation and hundreds if not thousands of articles and posts on getting stronger. I assumed that I needed to get a lot stronger to get bigger and getting stronger meant lifting heavier weights and training more frequently.

There is nothing wrong with getting stronger, but that wasn’t the original goal. Which brings us to the question – what is strength? I found this definition of muscular strength by Paige Waehner on About.com:

Strength refers to a muscle’s ability to generate force against physical objects. In the fitness world, this typically refers to how much weight you can lift for different strength training exercises.

If strength is measured in how much weight we can lift, then how can we lift more weight? By making the movement as EASY as possible. The way you do that is by executing a perfect form where the weight moves quickly through the repetition. You want the amount of time the weight spends on the targeted muscles minimized. If the weight spends too much time on the targeted muscles, fatigue will set in and the repetition will be aborted.

When you watch a weight class power lifter, there is a fluidity in the movement. Almost like a dance. Certainly they are strong, but the grace of the movement is equally as impressive. They are using momentum to get their numbers up. In the interview with High Intensity Trainer Luke Carlson on Conditioning Research, Luke said:

If the weight actually moves fast during strength training, momentum is introduced and muscle tension is reduced (as the musculature is essentially unloaded); this is the exact opposite of the goal of strength training and the requirement for muscle fiber recruitment.

In one sentence, he said exactly why you shouldn’t be chasing the classic definition of strength if your goal is building muscle. We need to recruit more muscle fibers and we need to do it safely. That means slowing down the movement and using machines. It means using less weight and not unloading the tension on the muscle with each repetition. In other words, Reps, Sets and the Weight Aren’t that Important.

The Original Goal: Just Build Muscle

You don’t need to bench or squat to build muscle. That fact that most guys use those exercises to do so, doesn’t mean it is necessary. Just fatigue the muscle in a safe manner using machines or static holds like those described in the e-book Hillfit. Then eat to a caloric surplus. I like foods with saturated fat, protein, sugars and cholesterol, such as dairy kefir or ice cream. Then rest. Rest a lot. Stop chasing strength and start chasing muscle.